- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:41:04 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/04/15 00:40, Brian Kardell wrote: > It seems a lot of people are confused by the 'fast' and 'complete' > profiles especially because of the name 'fast'... We have spent a a > lot of time discussing why they even exist. > > Jonathan Kingston (@KingstonTime) mentioned to me the same, and so > I'm just wondering if we're doing ourselves extra harm by calling it > 'fast'. It's not 'fast' in so much as 'what we already do and know > how to do in order to do the dynamic selector matching that is CSS'. > > So, what about just renaming them 'static-profile' and > 'dynamic-profile' as you can explain why right there in the spec and > it should be a little easier for people to grok and avoid confusion.. I agree about 'fast' and 'complete' being problematic, I heard many people say these words are meaningless in the context of CSS and then not understandable. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 09:41:29 UTC