On Friday 2014-09-19 10:41 -0500, David Hyatt wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 6:23 AM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> > I think Dave is on the right track. I think the CSS spec doesn't need to specify in detail how to arrange the bopomofo letters and tones relative to themselves - I think however the Chinese layout requirements document which is in preparation probably should.
> >
> > I propose we carry on.
>
> My preference would be for layout code to do it, since then I can just implement it in WebKit, and it would work with any font. Requiring the font to support it seems impractical to me.
>
> In order for layout code to do it, though, I need really good documentation telling me how to implement it.
At first glance, this seems odd to me, though I admit I'm far from
being an expert in this area.
Why should bopomofo be unique here? Isn't the norm that correct
positioning of glyphs (whether they're combining marks within a
grapheme cluster or separate grapheme clusters) be handled by the
font and the positioning of its glyphs, rather than being handled at
as high a level as CSS layout? Or is there some particular reason
for an exception here?
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)