- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:01:56 +1000
- To: Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, a quick question regarding implicit grid lines. Taking the following > example, I am placing 'e' into a row that doesn't exist in my rows > definition. So an implicit track is created to hold it. However my grid is > using a track for a fixed gutter between row and column tracks, what I > really want is a way to create that additional gutter track plus the row > track. > > I think this is a common scenario with current grid systems that designers > are using, is there a current way to get round this? It comes back to an > earlier discussion about having something like column-gap, was that idea > shelved? Yeah, you want row-gap and column-gap, and they've been shifted to Grid level 2, unfortunately. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 16:02:46 UTC