- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:16:19 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/24/14, 4:46 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> It seems that the interpolation from a basic shape to ‘none', or ‘none' >>to a basic shape is not allowed according to the spec [1]. IIRC, both >>interpolations are possible in WebKit and Blink. I think these should be >>added to the spec. > >I agree that "none" should be interpolable to/from any shape. I’m not sure. We should certainly *animate* between none and basic shapes, and that’s what appears to be implemented. The property switches between values at 50%, which is what I’d expect given the spec as it is. > >> IMO, it would be great if CSS Shapes could say that additive, >>accumulative animations as well as distance computations[2] are possible >>(as long as ellipse/circle do not have ‘farthest-side’/‘closest-side’ >>specified). The individual scalars of the shape function values are >>taken to compute the results. > >Sounds good to me. Addition is possible weird, but that's the >responsibility of the author to use responsibly. >Accumulative/distince computation definitely makes sense. Do either of you have examples where this would come in to play? Thanks, Alan
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 16:16:49 UTC