- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style@w3.org
> I think the fix would be adding, after "ruby" and before the "]"
> following it or elsewhere in that [ || ] expression:
> [ sub | super ]
> (just like the values of font-variant-caps are in a [ | ], since
> only one is allowed to be specified).
Fixed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
To: www-style@w3.org
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 1:27:56 PM
Subject: [css3-fonts] 'font-variant' shorthand missing sub and supert values (for font-variant-position)
The grammar for the 'font-variant' shorthand at:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/#propdef-font-variant
appears to be missing the 'sub' and 'super' values for the
'font-variant-position' subproperty defined at
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/#propdef-font-variant-position .
(Alternatively, if they were intentionally omitted, there should
probably be a note that they were, since font-variant can otherwise
express everything that its longhand subproperties can except for
cases with 'font-variant-ligatures: none' mixes with non-'normal'
values on the other subproperties.)
I think the fix would be adding, after "ruby" and before the "]"
following it or elsewhere in that [ || ] expression:
[ sub | super ]
(just like the values of font-variant-caps are in a [ | ], since
only one is allowed to be specified).
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 05:14:58 UTC