- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> The example, though, is broken. It shouldn't be using a comma. Fixed. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> To: "David Warring" <david.warring@gmail.com> Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 2:07:31 AM Subject: Re: [css-fonts] is font variant a list? On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:03 PM, David Warring <david.warring@gmail.com> wrote: > A quibble about this example versus the property definition from the css-fonts draft: > > p { > font-variant: discretionary-ligatures, > character-variant(leo-B, leo-M, leo-N, leo-T, leo-U); > } > > The property definition for font-variant doesn't seem to allow lists. > > Name:font-variant > Value:normal | none | [ <common-lig-values> || <discretionary-lig-values> || <historical-lig-values> ||<contextual-alt-values> || stylistic(<feature-value-name>) || historical-forms || styleset(<feature-value-name> #) || character-variant(<feature-value-name> #) || swash(<feature-value-name>) ||ornaments(<feature-value-name>) || annotation(<feature-value-name>) || [ small-caps | all-small-caps |petite-caps | all-petite-caps | unicase | titling-caps ] || <numeric-figure-values> || <numeric-spacing-values> || <numeric-fraction-values> || ordinal || slashed-zero || <east-asian-variant-values> || <east-asian-width-values> || ruby ] > Should the definition allow lists? I.E. 'Value: normal | none | [ <common-lig-values || ... || ruby ]# As Glenn said, the use of the || character in the grammar means you can choose any or all of them, space-separated. The example, though, is broken. It shouldn't be using a comma. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 05:12:03 UTC