- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 01:12:13 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/13/14, 5:46 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >On 10/13/2014 06:46 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: >> The flex items section [1] has a note that says that contiguous child >> elements with ‘display:table-cell’ have their anonymous table wrapper >>box >> become a flex item. But notes are not normative, and I don’t see any >>other >> text that covers this example. Perhaps the note should just be promoted >>to >> normative text? > >That's a regression from the CR. Thanks for pointing it out. > >I found the changeset responsible: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/dd7b53d4dd43/css-flexbox/Overview.bs > >Here's the corresponding fix: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/02ec94250862/css-flexbox/Overview.bs > >(I also switched us back to using 'display' instead of the longhands, >since >we're planning to remove that from CSS Display imminently.) > >Let me know if that looks good, or you have any other concerns or >suggestions! Looks good to me. Thanks! Alan
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 01:12:43 UTC