- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:01:01 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 17:01:30 UTC
On Oct 13, 2014 9:57 AM, "Simon Sapin" <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > > The ED defines: >> >> The max-content inline-size of a block container box is the >> inline-size of the box after layout, if all children are sized under >> a max-content constraint. > > > And: > >> max-content constraint >> A sizing constraint imposed by the box’s containing block that causes >> it to produce its max-content contribution. > > > So, max-content is what you get when you get max-content. This is not a useful definition. Note the distinction between "constraint" and "contribution". Those are different words. ^_^ > Also, intrinsic size computation should not involve actual layout, since it may be required (through "shrink-to-fit") as one of the early steps of layout itself. Hmm, that's badly worded. It doesn't actually require layout. I'll see about rewording. > http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/#intrinsic has a definition of max-content (preferred intrinsic width) that is not circular and does not involve layout. Preferred and max-content are not identical in all cases. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 17:01:30 UTC