- From: Bobby Mozumder <mozumder@futureclaw.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:12:27 -0400
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
- Cc: "Lewis, Eric" <eric.lewis@nytimes.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 13:13:06 UTC
This is a common layout design pattern. inDesign has a paragraph style option called “Balance Ragged Lines” that performs this exact feature. There are cases where you wouldn’t use it, and there are cases where you would use this. A good intro on where you would/wouldn’t use each: http://indesignsecrets.com/when-to-use-balance-ragged-lines.php -bobby --- Bobby Mozumder Editor-in-Chief FutureClaw Magazine mozumder@futureclaw.com +1-240-745-5287 www.futureclaw.com twitter.com/futureclaw www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder On Oct 12, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote: > I'm concerned that this proposal codifies behavior at too low a level, > making it difficult to do better in the future. Specifically, because > 'text-wrap: balance' is defined in terms of a concrete algorithm, it > could wind up forcing browsers to implement that exact algorithm for > 'text-wrap: balance', and, worse, forcing browsers to continue using > first-fit for 'text-wrap: normal' permanently. > > I'm also concerned that this is a "yes, fix this bug" switch. Under > what circumstances would one NOT want a headline, a section heading, > or indeed an entire paragraph to be wrapped such that all lines are of > similar length? Wouldn't it be better to encourage browsers to > implement better algorithms *which are on by default*? > > zw
Received on Monday, 13 October 2014 13:13:06 UTC