± A "generator of a disjunction" makes :matches() a special syntax form, not a ± real pseudo-class. That would be somewhat easier, but it would also be ± weird. Dunno if I wanna go down that road. Also, it's not a disjunction. If it was, the following two would be equivalent: a:matches(.b c, .d e) a.b c, a.d e If I understood the situation correctly, they are not.Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 17:56:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:48 UTC