Re: [csswg] Agenda conf call 26-nov-2014

Agenda additions:

The following two topics were left over from last week, could we take them first / early?

* :has-focus
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0271.html

* Interoperability of the interaction between text-overflow and scrolling:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0321.html

There's also been a bunch of threads about [css3-ui]. Quite a few are editorial/obvious and don’t need a formal resolution, but the following probably do:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0425.html
Issue 37: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0445.html
Issue 38: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0449.html
Issue 42: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0493.html
Issue 43: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0494.html
Issue 44: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0496.html
Issue 46: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0501.html

- Florian

> On 26 Nov 2014, at 10:23, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> 
> Time/Phone/SIP details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg. See
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JanMar/0078.html
> 
> ** CSS WG Members, please send regrets to Member-only list if you can't
> ** attend.
> 
> 0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> 1. new WD for CSS Transforms?
> -----------------------------
> 
> 2. Fixed position creating a new stacking context?
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0384.html
> 
> 3. extending :matches() to pseudo-elements?
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0526.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0475.html
> 
> Before figuring out the model, do Web authors need this and do we want
> this? Corollary question if answers are positive, do we want this now?
> 
> 4. specificity of :matches() inside :not()
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> (not sure we ever discussed this messsage from 31-oct...)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0530.html
> 
> 
> 5. applying pseudo classes to the label based on the labeled control
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0394.html
> 
> </Daniel>
> 

> On 26 Nov 2014, at 10:23, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> 
> Time/Phone/SIP details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg. See
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JanMar/0078.html
> 
> ** CSS WG Members, please send regrets to Member-only list if you can't
> ** attend.
> 
> 0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> 1. new WD for CSS Transforms?
> -----------------------------
> 
> 2. Fixed position creating a new stacking context?
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0384.html
> 
> 3. extending :matches() to pseudo-elements?
> -------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0526.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0475.html
> 
> Before figuring out the model, do Web authors need this and do we want
> this? Corollary question if answers are positive, do we want this now?
> 
> 4. specificity of :matches() inside :not()
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> (not sure we ever discussed this messsage from 31-oct...)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0530.html
> 
> 
> 5. applying pseudo classes to the label based on the labeled control
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0394.html
> 
> </Daniel>
> 

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 10:52:29 UTC