- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:54:43 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:56 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Thursday 2014-11-13 17:13 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> One significant change is that the <urange> production is much looser >> than the <unicode-range-token> parsing previously defined. <urange> >> does not attempt to ensure that the refs have at most 6 digits (or 6 >> total digits + question marks), as that would have made the speccing >> and implementation much more difficult. While I was against the >> looser definition when it was a token, as a microsyntax (which is only >> recognized when it's specifically called for) I'm fine with it being a >> little loose. This has no effect on its use in practice; it just >> means that you can write things like U+0000000 (7 digits) that weren't >> previously allowed. > > Now that the draft has restored the 6-digit restriction, I think > that restriction should be mentioned in the introductory section > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#urange rather than being hidden > only within http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#urange-syntax . Done. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 19:55:31 UTC