On Thursday 2014-11-13 17:13 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > One significant change is that the <urange> production is much looser > than the <unicode-range-token> parsing previously defined. <urange> > does not attempt to ensure that the refs have at most 6 digits (or 6 > total digits + question marks), as that would have made the speccing > and implementation much more difficult. While I was against the > looser definition when it was a token, as a microsyntax (which is only > recognized when it's specifically called for) I'm fine with it being a > little loose. This has no effect on its use in practice; it just > means that you can write things like U+0000000 (7 digits) that weren't > previously allowed. Now that the draft has restored the 6-digit restriction, I think that restriction should be mentioned in the introductory section http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#urange rather than being hidden only within http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#urange-syntax . -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 01:57:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:48 UTC