- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:07:57 -0500
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/16/2014 10:41 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > Currently it is undefined that how ruby-align should be applied > if there are spanning annotations. > > When previously discussed off the list, fantasai said that the > behavior would be equivalent to nested markup. However, I don't > think it is workable. With nested markup, there is a unique > ruby-align value applied to the whole inner ruby, while we may > have different values for each level when handling spanning. > On the other hand, in cases like <rbc><rb>a</rb></rbc><rtc>xyz</rtc>, > whether the content in the rtc is recognized as a span could > affect the result, which does not look correct to me. > > I suggest that, in those situations, non-spanning pairs are > directly expanded to match the width of the whole ruby, as if they > have a longer annotation in some level, regardless of ruby-align. > This could solve both problems I mentioned above. I'm confused. Can you give a more specific problematic example? <rbc><rb>a</rb></rbc><rtc>xyz</rtc> in particular doesn't look like a problem, it should behave exactly as <rb>a</rb><rt>xyz</rt>. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 20:08:31 UTC