Re: [css-ruby] spanning of ruby annotations across excess bases

On 11/14/2014 04:14 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, I don't see a problem here either. I would prefer, if it's
>> possible, that we only span if the content is directly contained
>> in an <rtc> rather than special-casing <rt>s that are the only
>> child. Is that workable? That was the original goal: to make
>> content directly contained by an <rtc> span all the bases.
>> The effects on <rt> was just error-handling that fell out of
>> that approach.
>
>
> I think it's workable. But I prefer the spec to say something like
> "If the only child of an <rtc> is an anonymous <rt>, which means
> that all content is directly contained by the <rtc>, it spans all
> the bases." so that we do not need to complexify the anonymous box
> generation part, and we won't apply something on <rt>s but forgot
> the content directly inside <rtc>s. Does that make sense?

Yes, that sounds exactly right. I will updated the spec accordingly.

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 21:56:23 UTC