- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:48 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20141112213548.GA28312@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 13:26 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:50 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> > 2. The current list of acceptable properties is
> > - color
> > - background-color
> > - cursor
> > - outline
> > - text-decoration
> > - text-emphasis-color (but not text-emphasis)
> > - text-shadow
> >
> > a. Are these acceptable?
> > b. Should any other properties be added?
> > c. All but the first two are currently optional. Should any others be
> > required?
>
> Why aren't we just using the ::first-line list?
::selection is implemented very differently from ::first-line;
::first-line works like a rendering object, whereas ::selection
changes the painting behavior of text. You also don't want to allow
::selection styles to affect layout.
> > 3. All four browser engines drop the OS colors with when either of 'color'
> > or 'background-color' is unspecified. This means we have to violate
> > dbaron's #2 requirement (that the OS colors be representable as a UA
> > style rule):
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0268.html
> >
> > Given that, I'm assuming this is a Web-compat requirement.
> > Shall this be required behavior?
>
> Assuming it's web-compat, yes.
Is someone going to check that assumption in some way?
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 21:36:15 UTC