- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:35:48 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20141112213548.GA28312@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2014-11-12 13:26 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:50 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > 2. The current list of acceptable properties is > > - color > > - background-color > > - cursor > > - outline > > - text-decoration > > - text-emphasis-color (but not text-emphasis) > > - text-shadow > > > > a. Are these acceptable? > > b. Should any other properties be added? > > c. All but the first two are currently optional. Should any others be > > required? > > Why aren't we just using the ::first-line list? ::selection is implemented very differently from ::first-line; ::first-line works like a rendering object, whereas ::selection changes the painting behavior of text. You also don't want to allow ::selection styles to affect layout. > > 3. All four browser engines drop the OS colors with when either of 'color' > > or 'background-color' is unspecified. This means we have to violate > > dbaron's #2 requirement (that the OS colors be representable as a UA > > style rule): > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0268.html > > > > Given that, I'm assuming this is a Web-compat requirement. > > Shall this be required behavior? > > Assuming it's web-compat, yes. Is someone going to check that assumption in some way? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 21:36:15 UTC