Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

On 11/7/14 9:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
>> what you do want.)
> I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.

Please give me @X and @Y in: <a href=@X>@Y</a>. (Doing so offlist is 
fine ;-)).


>> Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't
>> especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is
>> especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list.
>> Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD?

Ooops. I did mean "... is NOT especially harmful".

>>
>>> or bug tracker.
>> Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be
>> included.
> Why would I want feedback on this Note?

The bugzilla component is for the spec.

> (It's cool with you that I keep using the WebAppsWG product?)

I think we already have a precedence for doing this, so yes, this is 
fine with me.

-Thanks, AB