W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:11:53 -0500
Message-ID: <545CD329.7080406@gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/7/14 9:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
>> what you do want.)
> I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.

Please give me @X and @Y in: <a href=@X>@Y</a>. (Doing so offlist is 
fine ;-)).

>> Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't
>> especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is
>> especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list.
>> Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD?

Ooops. I did mean "... is NOT especially harmful".

>>> or bug tracker.
>> Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be
>> included.
> Why would I want feedback on this Note?

The bugzilla component is for the spec.

> (It's cool with you that I keep using the WebAppsWG product?)

I think we already have a precedence for doing this, so yes, this is 
fine with me.

-Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 14:20:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:48 UTC