W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:05:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78jfCPaYXiUmG+RzRV35Rpp7eFbf085DALNUkGQ+5SumMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
> what you do want.)

I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.

> Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't
> especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is
> especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list.
> Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD?
>> or bug tracker.
> Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be
> included.

Why would I want feedback on this Note?

(It's cool with you that I keep using the WebAppsWG product?)

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 14:06:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:48 UTC