- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:08:32 -0800
- To: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2014 11:32 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Sigh, /TR is TRash, etc. It's very possible that our implementors >> went off of the (older, obsoleted) WD instead. File a bug, please? > > Current implementation of 'stretch' follows the WD specification; it may > contains bugs, though. Please, please, never follow a TR spec when there's an Editor's Draft available. The TR spec, at best, will be identical to the ED; at worst, it'll be out of date and you'll implement the wrong thing, as happened here. There is never a benefit to implementing off of TR. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 18:09:24 UTC