- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:58:49 +0100
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
The i18n WG is satisfied with this resolution and has closed this issue. Thanks! RI On 20/04/2014 18:09, Koji Ishii wrote: > Hm, the text looks bad, but it’s a little hard to re-write as we already say: > | CSS does not fully define where soft wrap opportunities occur, > | however some controls are provided to distinguish common variations. > > I tried this text: > | Soft wrap opportunities are as defined above. > which links to where we refer to UAX14. > > Does this look ok? > > /koji > > On Jan 25, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > >> State: >> OPEN WG Comment >> Product: >> CSS3-text >> Raised by: >> Richard Ishida >> Opened on: >> 2013-12-11 >> Description: >> 5.3. Breaking Rules for Letters: the ‘word-break’ property >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-3-20131010/#word-break-property >> >> "Words break according to their usual rules. " >> >> >> If I understand correctly, it's not *words* that are breaking according to usual rules, but *text*. >> >> It may be worth clarifying that the 'usual rules' means basically according to UAX14 and the behaviour is therefore script dependent. > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 16:59:22 UTC