W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [css-text] I18N-ISSUE-322: text-justify: auto should recommend international typographic accuracy

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:11:48 +0100
Message-ID: <537F8154.9060607@w3.org>
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Thanks. There is a slightly stronger message in the second sentence of 
the auto section, but I'd still prefer to see the text of the example 
changed to make it clearer that the universal compromise is not really a 
*useful* compromise, and that UAs should (rather than 'could') apply 
more accurate typographic support where the language/script is known.

RI



On 10/05/2014 21:04, Koji Ishii wrote:
> fantasai and I worked on this and re-worded, please let us know if any. Thank you for the feedback.
>
> /koji
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:26, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote:
>
>> State:
>>     OPEN WG Comment
>> Product:
>>     CSS3-text
>> Raised by:
>>     Richard Ishida
>> Opened on:
>>     2013-12-11
>> Description:
>>     7.3. Justification Method: the ‘text-justify’ property
>>     http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-3-20131010/#text-justify-property
>>
>>     "One possible algorithm is to choose the appropriate justification behavior based on the language of the paragraph e.g. following [JLREQ] for Japanese, using cursive elongation for Arabic, using ‘inter-word’ for English, etc. Another possibility is to use a justification method that is a simple universal compromise for all writing systems, such as primarily expanding word separators along with secondarily expanding between CJK and Southeast Asian letters."
>>
>>     Rather than just throw out international variations in justification as an idea of something implementers may like to work on, I think we should recommend that implementers try to take into account international needs as far as possible.
>>
>>     I think we also need to add something about handling complex script syllables.
>>
>>     I would reword this paragraph as follows:
>>
>>     "Implementers are expected, to the extent possible, to make available appropriate justification behaviours based on the language of the paragraph e.g. character-dependent expansion rules for Japanese, using cursive elongation for Arabic, using ‘inter-word’ for English, keeping typographic syllables together in complex scripts, etc. Only where such linguistic tailorings have not yet been implemented should the browser use a justification method that is a simple universal compromise for all writing systems, such as primarily expanding word separators along with secondarily expanding between CJK and Southeast Asian letters."
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 23 May 2014 17:12:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:27 UTC