- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:34:13 -0700
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/13/2013 07:55 PM, Koji Ishii wrote: > This one is too hard for me to judge, I'll consult with my co-editor and get back to the ML. > > CE Whitehad wrote: >> 4.1.1. Example 4 >> >> "where the <ltr> element represents a left-to-right embedding and the <rtl> element represents a right-to-left embedding. >> If the ‘white-space’ property is set to ‘normal’, the white-space processing model would result in the following: >> >> The space before the B ( ) would collapse with the space after the A ( ). >> The space before the C ( ) would collapse with the space after the B ( ). >> This would leave two spaces, one after the A in the left-to-right embedding level, and one after the B in the >> right-to-left embedding level. This is then ordered according to the Unicode bidirectional algorithm, with the end result >> being: " >> >> { COMMENT: what you have is o.k., but with 'if . . . is . . . ' it is customary to use the future indicative for the >> 'then' clause; you have "[i]f the 'white-space' property is set to 'normal'," >> following this it is customary to use the future tense, that is to use "will" instead of "would." >> Later again, if you change these to the future, use the habitual/scientific present, "leaves," instead of "would leave." >> Also, perhaps because I am a southerner, I would say "[a]ll this is then ordered" instead of "[t]his is then ordered" (for >> clarity).} >> => >> "where the <ltr> element represents a left-to-right embedding and the <rtl> element represents a right-to-left embedding. >> If the ‘white-space’ property is set to ‘normal’, the white-space processing model would result in the following: >> The space before the B ( ) will collapse with the space after the A ( ). >> The space before the C ( ) will collapse with the space after the B ( ). >> This leaves two spaces, one after the A in the left-to-right embedding level, and one after the B in the right-to-left >> embedding level. All this is then ordered according to the Unicode bidirectional algorithm, with the end result being: " >> >> (I'll try to proofread the rest of this later today. I do not believe I will have comments on the content.) Ok, fixed. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2014 19:34:41 UTC