W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [css-flexbox] Better define the computed value of 'flex-basis'

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:01:25 -0700
Message-ID: <536A8305.7020603@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/07/2014 11:16 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Right now 'flex-basis' has its computed value defined as "as
> specified, with lengths made absolute".  This implies that
> "flex-basis: auto" (which means "use the value of width/height") stays
> as "auto" in the computed value, and it's not well-defined when this
> changes into the width/height value.
>
> fantasai and I propose that we define that "flex-basis: auto" computes
> to the width/height value.  Rossen concurred in a private discussion.
>
> This has some implications, which we think are acceptable.  In
> particular, it means that if a flex item has "flex-basis: auto", and
> it's also a flexbox and has a child with "flex-basis: inherit;", the
> child won't inherit the "auto" value - it will instead inherit the
> width/height value that "auto" computes to.  (Which might be "auto"!
> ^_^)  Use of "flex-basis: inherit;" is likely to be so rare that the
> confusion this might cause is irrelevant, however.

Even more info:

   Here's the start of the old discussion, which resulted in the current
   text:
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html

   This is tracked in the current DoC as Issue 13
     http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/issues-lc-20140325#issue-13

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2014 19:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:21 UTC