- From: Jochen Eisinger <eisinger@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:17:00 +0200
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 22:17:47 UTC
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:49:20 +0200, Jochen Eisinger <eisinger@google.com> > wrote: > > I see, I guess I was confused by reading >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaQueryListListenerinstead >> of the spec. >> > > OK. > > > In any case, I still don't understand the benefit of using >> addListener/removeListener over defining a change event? >> > > I guess it was considered to be more light-weight. But I'm not sure of the > history. > > As far as I can tell, WebKit/Blink support function or object with > handleChange. Gecko supports only function (like the spec). Haven't tested > IE. > > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2909 > > Given this, do you still prefer an event over dropping support for > handleChange? I will explore whether dropping support for handleChange will already simplify our implementation significantly before continuing. Thanks for the pointer! best -jochen > > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Monday, 31 March 2014 22:17:47 UTC