Re: [css-color] Moving sections, and grammar for <color>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Simon Sapin <> wrote:
> Just one thing: you didn’t include 'transparent'. Is it part of
> <named-color>? (While currentcolor isn’t?)

Yes, the section for "transparent" explicitly calls it out as a
<named-color> value.  The only reason I have it separate is because
all the other <named-color> values are fully opaque, and so separating
"transparent" out seems reasonable.

I'm unsure about currentcolor.  It doesn't act like the other named colors do.


Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 19:55:14 UTC