- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:23:11 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> Any updates on this?
>
> I think I am not understanding something. It seems if you make a
> relative selector absolute, you no longer need scope-contained vs
> filtered, as once it is absolute you can no longer match anything
> outside that subtree. What am I missing?
In particular, it seems everything I need is scope-filtered. Do I need
to say that explicitly?
I also noticed a problem, with the current descriptions I cannot
handle matches(). E.g. document.body.matches("body") yields true, as
would document.body.matches(":scope"), however, with either
scope-filtered or scope-contained the body element would not be in the
result of the match operation. Suggestions?
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 17:23:38 UTC