- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:58:52 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> They were traumatized by the need to write the same property with 4 or 5 >> different prefixes. Unless we have reason to expect future pages to load >> n versions of the same custom property I do not believe the scenario at >> hand to be quite comparable. > > Accordingly they associate seeing "-vnd-" in source code with trouble > but custom properties are not meant to be interpreted as trouble. I do not think it is useful or helpful to extrapolate Pavlov reflexes from the past, at least not without some context. There is a huge difference between the infamous: #something { -webkit-border-radius: 5px; -moz-border-radius: 5px; -o-border-radius: 5px; border:radius: 5px; } …and an hypothetical future: .orOther { width: 200px height: 200px; —jquery-scroll: carousel(...); —sassy-framework-says: groovy; } The former is 100% redundant; it is pure tax on the author. Not only is the latter not redundant but *those* prefixes do yield useful additional information about a property i.e. what it depends on at runtime. I do not think our opinion of authors needs to be so low we should assume they couldn't tell the difference. Though again, I do not believe this kind of prefixing needs to be required. It is sufficient that it can be done as needed. > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 18:59:24 UTC