- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:25:02 +0100
- To: "Brian Kardell" <bkardell@gmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
> CSS has a way to denote something nonstandard via > a vendor prefix, and it looks pretty much the same > whether that thing is a property, a pseudo-class, > a pseudo-element, etc. That's a huge win for > authors I think. +1 >I think that there is much sense in advising on a similar > scheme that works everywhere in CSS for author > provided custom things. +1; that's what Tab is trying to do right now btw > Secondarily, it would be even better in my opinion if one > could logically draw sense of the relationship to existing > vendor provided custom things. I'm not sure vendor-prefixed things are "custom". They are just not standardized, which is different; remember when everyone pondered supporting some "-webkit-" properties? Also: - “Don’t use vendor prefixes, ‘-webkit-xyz’ is bad” - “Please use custom things, ‘--abc-xyz’ is good.” Associating the two looks odd to me. That being said, I don't oppose to "--" as a prefix, it's still better than "var-", I just think it is not the best parallel one could draw.
Received on Sunday, 16 March 2014 15:25:37 UTC