- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:40:36 -0400
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 18:41:04 UTC
> > > Suppose we went with this. What do things look like in var()? > > * var(foo--bar-baz, fallback) > * var(foo.bar-baz, fallback) > * var(bar-baz, foo, fallback) > * var(bar-baz, fallback, foo) > > I'm not crazy about any of these var() options. > > I think we should stick with the status quo of "var-*". > > > Ted > > To be clear, that's not quite what I proposed, this is: foo-bar: standard CSS property named foo-bar-baz -[vendor]-foo-bar: Vendor prefixed(custom) property --foo-bar-baz: Non-vendor custom property What do things look like in var()? * var(--foo-bar, fallback) * var(foo-bar, fallback) * var(foo-bar, -webkit-foo-bar, --foo-bar) -- Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 18:41:04 UTC