- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:59:10 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Chris Eppstein" <chris@eppsteins.net>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
> > An issue we're bumping into in the sass community now is namespace
> > collisions from 3rd-party libraries. It would be nice if CSS could avoid
> > our mistake by forcing a namespace for custom properties.
>
> That's why I'd prefer "underscore anywhere in the name" over "leading
> underscore" - you can put the namespace before the underscore, leading
> to a nice visual separation.
Then I think we misread your proposal. If your proposal is to allow things
like
{
some_property: ...;
}
then I'm fine with it; I don't have a strong reason to prefer "." over "_"
(and I'm probably leaning towards "_" in this case)
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 17:59:37 UTC