- From: Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:28:57 +1100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:13:18PM -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Gecko: uses table wrapper box > IE11: uses table wrapper box > WebKit/Blink: uses table wrapper box deflated by the border of the > table box (!). > Presto: Same as WebKit, afaict. > > It seems to me that the only consistent options here are using the > padding edge of the table box or using the padding edge of the table > wrapper box (the latter being what Gecko and IE do)... I can't > figure out why the WebKit behavior would be desirable; it seems > strictly worse than using the padding edge of the table box. I'd guess that this comes from (inconsistently) assuming the borders to apply to the table wrapper box instead of the table box. In other words, I'd guess that the WebKit behaviour is simply a bug. Though it is a bit surprising that two layout engines would have such a bug; can you confirm that you really mean Presto, or do you mean the Chromium/Blink version of Opera? pjrm.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:29:03 UTC