- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:03:07 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 10/03/2014 22:55, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#extending-css2 extends the >>> counter() and counters() function to accept a <counter-style-name>, but >>> does >>> not define what happens when no counter style is defined with a >>> corresponding name. >>> >>> Compare with http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-lists/#propdef-list-style-type >>> that >>> defines list-style-type to fall back to 'none', and to CSS 2 where an >>> invalid <'list-style-type'> drops the declaration. >> >> >> Good catch. I think I'd prefer to fallback to "decimal", and change >> Lists to fallback to "decimal" as well. > > > Works for me. All right, I'm now handling unknown counter styles generically in the representation algorithm, so I've remove the special-casing in Lists that made it act like "none". ~TJ
Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 23:03:54 UTC