Re: [shadow-styling] /shadow vs /shadow-all

> On Mar 5, 2014, at 3:39 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> supporting
> "foo::shadow > bar" is a substantial burden for us in the short term,
> as our internal machinery is *not* capable of handling combinators
> after a pseudo-element right now.

So this selects the bar child of foo, when foo has become a component (meaning its descendants are now only selectable as part of a shadow DOM), right? Foo is in the state of being a shadow root? Sounds like a pseudo class to me. 

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 21:51:47 UTC