- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:53:53 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
En 04/03/14 20:25, Tab Atkins Jr. escribiu: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >> In the definition for <grid-line>, for the [ <integer> && <custom-ident>? ] >> case, the ED says: >> >>> If the <integer> is omitted, it defaults to 1. >> >> >> However, the <integer> can not be omitted. Or if it is, we fall into the >> <custom-ident> case that is described separately. I suggest just removing >> that sentence. (And replace "A value of zero" with "An <integer> value of >> zero" in the next.) > > Fixed. Actually instead of <custom-ident> | [ <integer> && <custom-ident>? ] | the spec could just say <custom-ident> || <integer> I guess that if the specs mention the two different cases is because <custom-ident> does not mean the same. Then I understand that for: [ <integer> && <custom-ident>? ] <custom-ident> must only be the name of an explicit grid line (and thus cannot be neither the name of a grid area nor the name of an implicit grid line created by a grid area). Is that correct? BR
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2014 12:54:24 UTC