- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:39:05 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 03/03/2014 19:18, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Hm, that's a good question. Technically, the definition of > <custom-ident> means that something which is allowed in a longhand is > illegal in a shorthand, which isn't great. It means we can't always > serialize a shorthand. > > I wonder if it's better to change the definition of <custom-ident> to > not do this? Instead, maybe it would only disallow the keywords that > it can be juxtaposed with. +1 > That seems hard to define, though. Hm. Is it enough to spec "when the grammar would be ambiguous"? Maybe that’s not obvious to determine. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 19:39:32 UTC