- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:23:50 -0400
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Specifically, this part of the text: A sequence of ruby base containers, ruby annotation containers, and/or inter-segment white space not parented by a ruby container is wrapped in an anonymous ruby container. The definition of "inter-segment white space", per step 5, is "anonymous ruby base containing only white space ...". The only way to get an anonymous ruby base is from step 3, and requires a ruby base container or ruby container parent. Therefore there cannot be any inter-segment white space which is not parented by a ruby base container or ruby base. If it's parented by a ruby base, there is nothing to do in step 7. So presumably this is talking about inter-segment white space parented by a ruby base container. For this white space to be inter-segment white space it must have a ruby base or ruby base container as a following sibling, and a ruby annotation or ruby annotation container as a previous sibling. Say it has a ruby base following sibling. So we're talking markup like this: <div style="display: ruby-base-container"> <div style="display: ruby-text-container"></div> <div style="display: ruby-base"></div> </div> In this case the final box structure called for in the spec seems to be identical to the one this markup would produce: <div style="display: ruby-base-container"> <div style="display: ruby"> <div style="display: ruby-text-container"></div> </div><div style="display: ruby-base"></div> </div> except that the trailing whitespace in the ruby container is NOT thrown out in this case and is treated as inter-segment white space. I strongly suspect that something here is buggy, but I'm not sure yet what this spec text is trying to accomplish, so I can't tell what the "something" is. -Boris
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 21:24:18 UTC