On Jul 24, 2014, at 11:12 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Thursday 2014-07-24 17:22 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In >>> particular, some time ago we resolved that "non-animatable" properties >>> should still animate, by just flipping from the start value to the end >>> value at 50% of the transition's progress. Nobody implements this >>> yet, but it's still intended behavior, afaik. >> >> I was looking for this in css-transitions and I couldn't find it so we may >> have catch-up to do in both specs. I assume animations would do the same >> thing for non-animatable properties, though of course the 50% point would >> be the mid-point between the two keyframes that update the property. Does >> that make sense? > > We agreed to do this for animations and agreed NOT to do it for > transitions, so the prose should be in animations. I definitely missed that distinction. Do you recall when that was discussed? I'd love to go read why we exclude this from transitions; the fact that it'll do something in animations but nothing in transitions sounds potentially confusing...Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 18:22:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:45 UTC