Re: [css-ruby] Nested Ruby

On 07/11/2014 10:25 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/11/14, 5:09 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> Yes, step 6 re-interprets the box as a ruby annotation. I'm not
>> sure how to make that more clear.
>
> Well, does step 4 create an anon box at all?  If not, I think
> _that_'s the part that needs to be clarified.

According to the text currently, yes. The box is constructed in
step 4, and is potentially transformed into a different type of
box in step 6.

If you have a better idea of how to explain the expected result,
let me know...

~fantasai