- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:25:28 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On 7/11/14, 5:09 PM, fantasai wrote: > Yes, step 6 re-interprets the box as a ruby annotation. I'm not > sure how to make that more clear. Well, does step 4 create an anon box at all? If not, I think _that_'s the part that needs to be clarified. > It really creates a ruby annotation box for the purposes of layout. > > However, pairing is handled specially: it can pair only with an > inter-base white space box. (Is that not clear somehow?) I haven't gotten my brain wrapped around the pairing section yet, so I'm not sure whether it's clear. I think just having the whitespace be wrapped in a ruby annotation box and then having pairing handle it makes total sense. -Boris
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 21:25:57 UTC