- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:03:11 +0200
- To: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53C7914F.6040203@kosek.cz>
On 16.7.2014 23:08, Lea Verou wrote: > Agreed in principle, but this sounds like the common “let’s turn this > into a more generic mechanism” argument, which, despite sounding good > in theory, usually just ends up stalling progress, as nobody wants to > work on the huge problem of defining the more generic (and complex) > mechanism, so the easier solution is to just do nothing. Such generic mechanism will be needed for GCPM anyway if it wants to compete with XSL-FO for non-trivial cases. So adding more ad-hoc features like string concatenation instead of introducing one coherent expression language right now will cause more pain in future. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 09:03:48 UTC