- From: Rafal Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:24:41 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
W dniu 11.07.2014 11:44, fantasai pisze: > On 07/10/2014 04:39 AM, Rafal Pietrak wrote: >> >> Still, wouldn't it be worthwhile pondering on text-decoration-image >> (or the earlier Sebastian Zartner proposal) at this point? > > No. Maybe at some future point, but we still have a ways before > implementations even catch up to the spec as it stands, and adding > image support is going to be super complicated in comparison. I'm not so sure of that. 1. the image support "per se" is present in browsers from (i think) mozaic days. 2. at minimum the only vital difference "at/for text-decoration" from standard "repeat image" is observing line breaks (and line height) - clipping to "line box". 3. the decoration-image becomes quite useful when there is an option to control positioning (perpendicular to baseline) of the image. 4. apart from that, explicit z-index is almost all that is imaginably usefull for that. > When we've got solid support for non-image decorations, and there's > a strong demand for image decorations, we can think about it then. Hmm. Here I may be entirely wrong, but I've looked at public comparetions of browsers support for css3. it looks like the text-decoration-style is currently only sported by mozilla. So when others start coding, getting additional image support may be just a small additional effort with a particular leap to next release. Of course current css3 text-decoration looks feature-reach and may be sufficient for a long time .... or even "forever". But. All I wanted to say is that maybe it's worth sattling today on whether decoration-image is currently perceived as a "next-step", or may be as a "no-go" in foreseeable future. -R
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 12:25:33 UTC