- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:28:15 +0100
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "robert\@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Alan Stearns wrote: http://books.spec.whatwg.org/#baseline-rhythms > You don’t provide a complete definition of either property in your spec. > The description of the ‘root’ rhythm buried in a note (which I believe is > not normative) and is contradicted by the value definition. You do not > describe what happens when line boxes do not align with their element’s > rhythm. Your example illustrations do not match their prose. Instead of > attempting to specify by example, you could try adding normative prose > that describes the feature and use the examples to point out the > implications of the normative prose. > > You asked for suggestions - I suggest you fix these problems before you > ask for feedback. I haven't actively asked for feedback until now as that part of the spec is still in the embryo stage -- I only mentioned it today as it seemed relevant to the discussion. Anyway, thanks for your comments. I agree with some of them. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 26 January 2014 01:29:00 UTC