Not if you don’t know whether the article content would or would not cause the whole screen to be used. If your use a positioned element and an exclusion you could end up with ##### ##### ### )))))))))) // after the fold )))))))))) )))))))))) while this solution yields ##### ##### ### )))))))))) )))))))))) )))))))))) // after the fold in this case. The key is that the first region has a max-height of 100vh, not a height of 100vh. De : rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] De la part de Robert O'Callahan Envoyé : samedi 25 janvier 2014 11:52 À : Alan Stearns Cc : www-style@w3.org Objet : Re: [css-regions] responsive and semantic use of named flows Wouldn't this be more naturally expressed by making the <aside> be some kind of positioned float or exclusion, positioned below the fold, that the <article>s all flow around? Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o wReceived on Saturday, 25 January 2014 11:21:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC