W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

RE: [css-regions] responsive and semantic use of named flows

From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:21:14 +0100
Message-ID: <DUB404-EAS4224B45D8670115B57E9A38A5A00@phx.gbl>
To: <robert@ocallahan.org>, "'Alan Stearns'" <stearns@adobe.com>
CC: <www-style@w3.org>
Not if you don’t know whether the article content would or would not cause the whole screen to be used. If your use a positioned element and an exclusion you could end up with

	##### 
	##### 
	### 
	  
	   
	))))))))))	// after the fold
	))))))))))
	))))))))))

while this solution yields

	##### 
	##### 
	### 
	))))))))))
	))))))))))
	)))))))))) 	// after the fold

in this case. The key is that the first region has a max-height of 100vh, not a height of 100vh.




De : rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] De la part de Robert O'Callahan
Envoyé : samedi 25 janvier 2014 11:52
À : Alan Stearns
Cc : www-style@w3.org
Objet : Re: [css-regions] responsive and semantic use of named flows

Wouldn't this be more naturally expressed by making the <aside> be some kind of positioned float or exclusion, positioned below the fold, that the <article>s all flow around?


Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp  waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 11:21:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC