- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:21:14 +0100
- To: <robert@ocallahan.org>, "'Alan Stearns'" <stearns@adobe.com>
- CC: <www-style@w3.org>
Not if you don’t know whether the article content would or would not cause the whole screen to be used. If your use a positioned element and an exclusion you could end up with
#####
#####
###
)))))))))) // after the fold
))))))))))
))))))))))
while this solution yields
#####
#####
###
))))))))))
))))))))))
)))))))))) // after the fold
in this case. The key is that the first region has a max-height of 100vh, not a height of 100vh.
De : rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] De la part de Robert O'Callahan
Envoyé : samedi 25 janvier 2014 11:52
À : Alan Stearns
Cc : www-style@w3.org
Objet : Re: [css-regions] responsive and semantic use of named flows
Wouldn't this be more naturally expressed by making the <aside> be some kind of positioned float or exclusion, positioned below the fold, that the <article>s all flow around?
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 11:21:50 UTC