- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:42:17 +0100
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "CSS WWW Style \(www-style\@w3.org\)" <www-style@w3.org>
Alan Stearns wrote: > >I have read your arguments. For me, the separation of style from > >structure one of the foundations CSS stands on. Probably THE > >foundation. So I don't think we should break that priciple, even if it > >seems convenient to do so. > > I think that’s the crux of the issue. The rest of your points in the ala > article are a bit outdated If so, I challenge you to write a compelling first example for the specification that doesn't have any of the problmes I point out. > but that’s understandable when you dismiss the > whole spec on these principled grounds. I’m hoping the CSSWG can have a > good discussion next week about when separation of concerns MUST apply. > I’m fairly certain I understand your position, and I’ll make sure it’s > represented in the discussion. Remember to get the approval of the HTML communities as well! Cheers, -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 20:42:52 UTC