On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > After thinking through it more, yeah, you're right. We don't want to > *actually* mess with the boxes, but we *do* want to allow people to > use 'padding' for the end edges of their scrollable content the same > way they can with the start edges. > > So yeah, just growing the overflow area by the amount of the padding > along the end edges would work. > I'm not totally opposed to that idea, but there is still going to be confusion about what the padding box and content boxes of the scrolled element actually are --- in authors' minds, if not the spec. So I'm not convinced it's a clear win. I'd like to hear the opinions of more people. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o wReceived on Friday, 17 January 2014 01:09:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC