W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Proposal: will-change property (formerly will-animate)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:29:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCnL68khHgX7P1iC4oxPt_y-9ubGDSWykC2PCQ4dhvLGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com> wrote:
> The discussion appears to have converged in the previous post[1]. Here's a
> summarily of what I believe is the current consensus.
>
> For justification of the property please see the initial proposal and
> discussion.
>
> The property would accept:
> will-change: [auto | initial | inherit | unset] | <animatable-feature> [,
> <animatable-feature>]+
> <animatable-feature> = scroll-position | contents | <custom-ident>
>
> custom-ident will match current and future CSS properties.
> I believe we want custom-ident to explicitly reject the following:
> none (we decided to punt on that for now), all
>
> Stacking context behavior:
> will-change will induce a stacking context if the non-initial value of any
> of the specified <custom-ident> match a CSS property induces a stacking
> context.

What's the stacking-context behaviro of scroll-position and contents?

~TJ
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 00:30:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC