- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:38:50 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/14/2014 12:42 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > Hi, > > Some more nits that I found: > > The section generic break values[1] uses the term "principle box" > which hasn't been introduced before. principle to what? That should be principal box, actually. Added link to CSS2.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#block-boxes This section of CSS2.1 isn't great, but fixing that is out of scope for Fragmentation. :/ > The “Applies to” row of 'break-inside’ says "flow that that establish”[2]. It says "elements in the normal flow that that establish formatting contexts, or are block containers, table row groups, or table rows", which is correct afaict. > (Also, the anker name is #break-within, you maybe want to change that) The anchor for break-before/after is break-between, this is intended to be parallel to that, so, not supposed to match the property name necessarily... > The properties, break-inside, break-after and break-before say “generated box”. A box might not be generated IIRC. Maybe you mean "fragmentation container"? No, it should be "principal box". :) The term "generated box" is inherited from 2.1, I think. It's more accurate to say "principal box", though. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 02:39:19 UTC