On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 01/03/2014 02:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> It actually is intended to be justify-self, with reference to the >> Alignment spec. But it could be changed to justify-content on the >> container instead. > > Ah, right -- I see 'justify-self' is linkified to point there. Makes sense. > > I think it'd be worth changing -- I think it's clearer if it uses a > property that's defined & explained in the flexbox spec. > > It's also less likely to be a source of headaches for people trying to > test & build on top of that example. (It's conceivable that UAs with > flexbox support may take a while to honor the other CSS Alignment > properties -- I don't know if any browser supports "justify-self" right > now. So anyone trying to test the code from that example will likely run > into trouble, currently, because "justify-self" will be rejected.) Done. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 23:13:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC