W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

Re: [css-flexbox] Example 3 mentions "justify-self" when I think it wants to say "justify-content"

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:12:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDBU3QfORKHPMRHZe2JHVy0MLsWzzUu4EXJz0oVZByWew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 01/03/2014 02:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> It actually is intended to be justify-self, with reference to the
>> Alignment spec.  But it could be changed to justify-content on the
>> container instead.
> Ah, right -- I see 'justify-self' is linkified to point there. Makes sense.
> I think it'd be worth changing -- I think it's clearer if it uses a
> property that's defined & explained in the flexbox spec.
> It's also less likely to be a source of headaches for people trying to
> test & build on top of that example. (It's conceivable that UAs with
> flexbox support may take a while to honor the other CSS Alignment
> properties -- I don't know if any browser supports "justify-self" right
> now. So anyone trying to test the code from that example will likely run
> into trouble, currently, because "justify-self" will be rejected.)


Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 23:13:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC