On 01/03/2014 02:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > It actually is intended to be justify-self, with reference to the > Alignment spec. But it could be changed to justify-content on the > container instead. Ah, right -- I see 'justify-self' is linkified to point there. Makes sense. I think it'd be worth changing -- I think it's clearer if it uses a property that's defined & explained in the flexbox spec. It's also less likely to be a source of headaches for people trying to test & build on top of that example. (It's conceivable that UAs with flexbox support may take a while to honor the other CSS Alignment properties -- I don't know if any browser supports "justify-self" right now. So anyone trying to test the code from that example will likely run into trouble, currently, because "justify-self" will be rejected.) Thanks, ~DanielReceived on Monday, 6 January 2014 19:12:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC