- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 15:26:24 -0800
- To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20140108232624.GA17587@crum.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2011-11-01 13:33 +0100, Rune Lillesveen wrote: > The current draft says: > > "Implementations also must not start a transition when the computed > value changes because it is inherited (directly or indirectly) from > another element that is transitioning the same property." > > Should it also say something along the lines of: > > "Implementations also must not start a transition when the computed > value changes because a relative length is resolved against a > transitioning font-size." ? > > > I am having issues with various combinations of font-size, relative > lengths, and inheritance because computed values rely on relative > lengths, and it's not clear from the spec how it's supposed to work. > An example where Chrome and Firefox behave differently: The material in the transitions spec describing starting of transitions has been substantially rewritten, as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Nov/0192.html . I believe this rewrite should clarify the behavior in this set of cases. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 23:27:06 UTC